The study will be a four-arm study with 3,200 people. Study arms will be rescue ICS (use of inhaled corticosteroids as part of rescue therapy), azithromycin therapy, rescue ICS plus azithromycin, or control. All participants will record their asthma symptoms using online tools (Asthma Symptom Monitoring).
This page provides more details about the study groups and the supporting evidence.
The primary outcome will be yearly asthma exacerbation rates compared across the three intervention arms to the control arm. Secondary outcomes will be asthma control and asthma quality of life.
Many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as part of rescue therapy. These studies included both ICS plus a short acting beta agonist (ICS SABA)[1-3 - see References section] as well as an ICS plus a long-acting beta agonist (ICS LABA).[4-6] Across efficacy and pragmatic trials, these approaches have reduced exacerbations from 7% to 50%.
Recently the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)[7] added ICS LABA therapy for rescue therapy as the preferred approach in steps 3 and 4 as did the new US guidelines released in December, 2020.[8] Based on recent studies, GINA recently expanded ICS LABA to all steps as rescue therapy.[7] Neither guideline has officially addressed ICS SABA rescue therapy, though a number of randomized controlled trials showed positive results.[1, 2, 9]
The PREPARE study using ICS SABA in participants of African American/Black race or Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity [3] demonstrated a 13% reduction in exacerbations, improved ACT scores by over 3 points and ASUI scores by almost 1 point at the population level (both greater than the patient MID) and decreased lost days of school or work by 20%, all statistically significant.[10]
Based on the available evidence, the iTREAT study is examining the role of rescue ICS in improving asthma control. Rescue ICS includes SMART (Single Maintenance And Reliever Therapy) or PARTICS (Patient Activated Reliever Trigger Inhaled Corticosteroids). Patients with their clinicians will decide which approach works best for them.
SMART: Patients already prescribed Symbicort or Dulera will stay on those; patients on another inhaler have their prescription changed to Symbicort. Patients are instructed to take a puff of Symbicort twice a day and as needed when they have symptoms. Patients receive 2 Symbicort inhalers. One inhaler should be used twice a day every day as a controller medicine. The other should be used INSTEAD of their reliever inhaler.
For PARTICS, patients can stay on their current controller medicine. They will receive a prescription for an extra ICS, and should use that inhaler puff for puff every time they use their reliever inhaler. If patients use a nebulizer for their reliever medicine, they take 5 puffs of their PARTICS ICS every time they use their nebulizer.
We think patients will choose SMART if they are already prescribed Symbicort or Dulera or are willing to switch to Symbicort from their current ICS. We think patients will choose PARTICS if they use a nebulizer, are unable to afford switching to Symbicort or Dulera (or their insurance will not cover the cost), or are not prescribed Symbicort or Dulera and prefer to keep taking their current ICS.
Azithromycin (AZ), an azalide macrolide antibiotic with anti-inflammatory properties, has shown efficacy in reducing asthma exacerbations,[11, 12] though who will respond best to treatment is not clear.[13] Some individuals treated with AZ have been able to stop ICS use for prolonged periods,[14, 15] remaining symptom-free for years after completing [6-12] months of AZ.[14, 15] The mechanism of action for macrolide therapy for asthma is currently unknown. Two mechanisms have been postulated: (1) macrolides have intrinsic immunomodulatory/anti-inflammatory activity that may be more specific for neutrophil-mediated inflammation;[16] and (2) macrolides have anti-microbial activity against persistent intracellular infections, particularly mycoplasma and chlamydia organisms.[17-20] Both mechanisms may be at play in reducing asthma severity across individuals.[16] This study will attempt to determine who responds to AZ treatment.
This study will use Asthma Symptom Monitoring (ASM), which studies show raises patients’ awareness of worsening symptoms earlier so that treatment can be adjusted in time to avoid exacerbations.[21-25]
This study is funded by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
iTREAT is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov
Copyright © 2025 DARTNet Institute - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.